Morning Star Fish Report

 

Fish Report 4/24/07

Fish Report 4/24/07
Still toggin' along
Sea bass soon
 
 
Hi All,
A huge storm and a terrible tragedy since my last report. Effects from both will ripple through some families for generations.
A simpler thing ~ what's going on 'out front' with the bottom fishing.
Right now, water temperature is king. The control of when sea bass will come into their spawning grounds for about 7 1/2 months is all about temperature. It fell almost 3 degrees during the giant blow and is still below 50. The 'magic number' seems to be 52 - 54.
I have heard that sea bass are running here already. I have no idea where those reports are coming from. We are seeing 1 or 2 sea bass a day. Not per-person ~ on the whole boat.
All told, it seems as though it may be a fairly normal May. That would be a good thing!
Couple weeks of toggin' left. We've had trips with great success and a few that were brutal. The 8+ foot remnant swells last Friday made for difficult fishing. A couple guys ended up fine, others barely scratched a day out of it.
As the swell height diminished through the weekend the fishing got easier. Even then, on a day when all aboard were limited, one fellow -a guy I know can put 'em in the boat- couldn't shake the skunk.
Ah, toggin... It really is a unique fishery.
No limits today, a lot of tags though - 52 to be exact. One fellow commented that he'd never seen any legal fish go back before. I think he was still pondering it when he drove off.
Soon we'll come into the 'transition', that time when we nick a few tog and a few bass. It's a little while off yet - coming.
Need to do a new video release. Maybe I'll do a time/season lapse segment of a reef's changes as well as more fishery impact 'before and afters'.
The Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Council met in OC last week. I have an application for a Council seat before the Governor; thought it would be a good time to go take a good look at the process. Learned this is a place where they play hardball; a place where fisheries science takes a seat next to urban legend and outright baloney; a place where connections and knowing how to manipulate the process can be key.
I'd be on the left side of that bell curve... Maybe get a chance to see exactly where.
One thing that especially struck me occurred during the artificial reef/special management zone comment period. After an excellent presentation by Bill Figley, the retired director of New Jersey's reef program, speakers on both sides of the issue talked about the natural reef that bass/lobster traps are often set on. Another fellow used one of my habitat characterizations word for word. No one held up a hand to say, "Wait a minute, I thought there wasn't any natural reef in the region." Nope. In fact, several comments had the reefs being constructed on existing natural reefs. (I seriously doubt that - I sure wouldn't site material on already productive bottom) A comment from a hard-line commercial rep from NC suggested that if all the traps were removed from the artificial reefs then he'd have rockhopper trawlers come tow over the areas.
800 pound gorilla?
Here I thought it was a secret that there's natural reef out there and towing gear across reefs wrecks 'em; that traps on any reef are the only line of defense against towed gear impacts - and that only if the towed gear operator has respect for the trapper.
Great big ugly gorilla.
Ah well, at least this part of the meeting occurred in a transparent way...
Makes toggin' look like cotton candy.
See you on the rail.
Regards,
Monty
 
Capt. Monty Hawkins
mhawkins@siteone.net
Party Boat "Morning Star"
Reservations 410 520 2076
www.morningstarfishing.com

 

Fish Report Easter '07

Fish Report ~ Easter '07
Artificial Reef SMZs
Going Toggin'
 
Hi All,
Snuck a couple days in - lost a few days too. Dagoned April snow; who'd a thought it!
More of a mixed size of togs now, or at least the last few days. Gotta have acorns before you have oaks...
Released a few real dandies; fish up to 27 3/4 inches. Boated some too ~ even had some who took limits. Sure wasn't what we had in Feb/early March, but OK.
That's toggin'.
Tautog are never as densely schooled as sea bass or other types of reef fish. (Perhaps, more correctly, I should say I've never seen them that thick.) Everything about this fishery - previous experience, tag returns, and how the fishing is going - it all tells me that the most cautionary approach is needed to prevent treading down the same path ~ fishing them into a collapse.
Toggin's a fishery that will always be about challenge and not about groceries. I often find that the folks who have mastered the catching are most prone to the releasing. Respect.
Have a few for dinner? Sure. But the catching is where the fun is. Not catching? Oh humble day...
This I do know; what we catch in the future depends on what we don't take today. If we build more reef and manage the fishery wisely, the best tog fishing lies ahead!
Toggin' 'till the end of April - starting Tuesday the 'book' is open. Sailing every day - weather permitting. 15 people sells out the rail - crabs and clams provided - 7am to 3pm - Only 1 female tog over 20 inches in your 5 fish limit ~and no assurance whatsoever of a limit!~ Reservations required and leave the best phone number possible in the event of a cancellation, there will be more spring storms...
Thoughts on commercial traps on artificial reef below. Hot potato!
Regards,
Monty
 
 
There is presently an attempt being made to create Special Management Zones, or SMZs, around many artificial reef sites. Apparently, the problem here is nowhere near as bad as to our north, though it can be irritating. Local trappers use 2 flags -one on either end- with 20 traps between. I gather that further north each trap has a buoy on it - very like the 'drop pot' traps that are set directly on a reef/wreck. Trapping with one buoy per trap would render our reefs unnavigable - very frustrating.
This is how I see the issue in a longer timeline:
A) For 70+ years we've been losing natural coral colonies ~natural reef~ to stern towed gears. Often times when there's an impact to natural reef, there's a trap fisher that just lost money in equipment and lost future catch revenues.
B) In any biological habitat study - whether it's Brazilian rainforest, Kansas prairie or mid-Atlantic seafloor - there's an equation that can be used to calculate 'holding capacity'. The particular holding capacity we're looking at is for demersals like tog and sea bass. In this case, the total amount of all types of reef equal the region's holding capacity.
By losing reef 'footprint' to stern towed gears -the rocky areas covered by natural reef- we lose holding capacity. Less reef = less fish. As time goes along, less habitat has to mean less fish. And that's before anyone wets a line or soaks a trap targeting these fish. Losing habitat means lost opportunities for spawning success and concentrates whatever fish there are left on a shrinking footprint of habitat. That makes it easier to catch them ~ but only temporarily. Once habitat is destroyed, it is taken out of production and can no longer be counted in the holding capacity. Only viable reef habitat is fishable and productive.
Remember when everyone was clapping each other on the back because the 9 inch sea bass limit was allowing them to come back? What happened? We had jillions of little sea bass ~ With the size limit now at 12 inches we should be able to walk on 'em with all the eggs...
Nope. Flounder regs eased - trawl effort expanded - reef diminished - and spawning success of sea bass declined.
Recreational sea bass fishing used to be about drifting the natural bottoms. Many decades ago the fishing spots ~the reef-like habitats~ were found with a compass and a watch. We can hardly imagine the drifts -the catching- that must have occurred in times past.
The main point is, our holding capacity is not what it could be. If you leave rocky bottom alone, reefs grow. Period. Tow a trawl, clam or scallop dredge over the rocky bottom and you have some rocks. No reef.
C) Artificial reef is almost always trawl proof. Risk of gear loss prevents anyone from towing a reef site. Artificial reef also increases holding capacity with each piece placed, and necessarily increases the region's habitat footprint. Building artificial reef is great for fish and fishing!
D) Some years ago the MAFMC declared a moratorium on sea bass permits. No new permits would be issued to commercial fishers after a certain date. Pretty late in the game; fellows were used to 'the permit grab'. Anyone who had ever sold black sea bass and still had a receipt from a fish market could get a permit. They did. Permits are worth money - especially moratorium permits!
There was no effort made to grade the permits based on previous landings. You either qualified or didn't based on any proof of sale.
The "moratorium" created one heck of a lot of new effort - new fishers buying and setting traps with their new license.
In a time of Total Allowable Catch, TAC, quota driven fisheries management - the new permittees were entitled to whatever they could land before the quota was filled and the fishery closed until the next period.
E) The guys that had been trapping bass/lobster/tog all along weren't about to let a bunch of newbies jump on their spots. Heck no! That's a serious, serious no-no in the commercial world. They'll cut the buoys, pop the doors and empty the traps. Just a friendly reminder of who's spot it is sort of thing... Witness the discovery channel commercial fishing shows when someone tries to trap in another's area. It's war. 
F) The newly permitted guys discover an untapped and untrapped resource -an area where the old-school trappers hadn't set gear- Artificial Reefs!
G) Present day troubles.
 
How in the world we could undo the initial permitting fiasco I can't guess. Far too late, I'd think.
Otherwise, if we had large areas of natural rock substrate that were trap and hook only ~areas where no stern towed gears were allowed~ then a lot of reef would grow back. There'd be a lot more sea bass/lobster/tog growing as the new habitat aged. No baloney - I've documented habitat loss on film. Leave it be a few years and fish start using it again. They spawn and the cycle starts moving in the right direction.
With more productive natural reef there will be less pressure on artificial reef.
Instead of trappers, recreational fishers and fisheries ecologists moving to create areas off-limits to the gears that screw it up; we have fisheries ecologists holding the reigns that are very comfortable with the status quo -that there isn't any scientifically documented natural reef in the mid-Atlantic- and a mega-contest brewing between the new trap fishers and rec fishers that like to fish artificial reefs.
Our seafloor doesn't have a whole lot of rock - it's a small percentage.
We'd have a lot more fish if we focused on what's keeping the fish populations down. It's in every aspect of fisheries management ~~Essential Fish Habitat~~ EFH. Magnusen Act ~yada-yada~ All federally funded fisheries management is supposed to look at EFH.
Hasn't happened yet...
 
What's the solution? A few ideas:
Single trap/buoy sets should be kept off - there's no way for an average skipper to safely anchor with traps set in that manner on a reef.
A permit that directly funds reef building with cost based on extraction wouldn't seem out of the ordinary with any other natural resource. This would go for recreational users as well as commercial.
Restoring the natural reef footprint through habitat protection would go a long way toward easing pressure on artificial reef.
 
When there's a lot of fish there's less conflict. We've got management -the sizes, limits and seasons- nailed down pretty tight; expanding the habitat footprint and increasing fish production will bring it all together.
 
 

 

Fish Report 4/1/07

Fish Report 4/1/07
Goin' Fishin'
Editorial
 
 
Hi All,
This past week found toggin' - eh, OK.
Really. A few days were just decent, one excellent, and a stinker.
Did have a fish tip the scale to 17 pounds. When your hot your hot ~ Sam's...
I'm pretty sure this is the last year we're going to legally be able to keep 5 tautog. I'm certain that'd be a good thing.
Until then ~effective immediately aboard the Morning Star~ anglers will be permitted only one female tog over 20 inches in their legal creel limit.
No April Fool's joke: More spawn's a good thing.
Causing another tog crash wouldn't be.
Going Fishing - Tuesday - 4/3 - 7am to 3pm - crabs provided - reservations required - calling for a nice day.
And, we'll book reservations for April 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 as above - be sure to leave the best phone number in the event of weather cancellation though.
Below is an 'editorial' I wrote and was published locally.
Regards,
Monty
 
Capt. Monty Hawkins
mhawkins@siteone.net
Party Boat "Morning Star"
Reservations 410 520 2076
www.morningstarfishing.com
 
 
Rebuilding Fisheries From The Bottom Up
 
The "Fisheries in Decline" problem makes the news on occasion. Some fish, such as sea trout, were so abundant only 30 years ago that no one thought they could collapse: they're gone and remain so.
Still, like the herring and black-back gulls whose numbers were below 10,000 a century ago, it is possible to restore species, sometimes to new heights.
Our region of the mid-Atlantic has numerous reef-dwelling species such as lobster, sea bass, tautog, codfish and porgy. Even flounder and sand tiger shark use the habitat. Some remain economically viable fisheries, others are just a memory.
Although 'coral reef' conjures up images of lush islands and tropical seas, a closer study of corals reveals huge areas of this important seafloor habitat in temperate waters such as ours. In fact, corals flourish even at tremendous depths and frigid temperatures. They can occur anywhere that hard substrate, like rock or the hull of a sunken ship, exists.
Preserving habitat is important in any species restoration effort. Around the world corals are being mapped and protected - not just because they are coral, that's certainly important, but because they form a key habitat to so many of the stressed fisheries.
And then there's the mid-Atlantic.
Unfortunately, a geological seafloor study by Wigley and Theroux in 1981 failed to find anything other than sand and mud throughout the mid-Atlantic and therefore presumed there was no "hard-bottom" for hundreds of miles of mid-Atlantic coast. Another study, Stiemle and Zetlin 2000, found a little.
Too bad they didn't ask the fishers.
Almost since the inlet was cut in 1934, a time when marlin were frequently caught within 15 miles of Ocean City, the reef species have been a large part of the commercial and recreational fishing economy.
You can be sure that artificial reef construction hadn't even been considered at that point. A handful of shipwrecks could not have provided the footprint of habitat needed to create the fantastic catches of that era. It would be a long time before the electronics necessary to pinpoint their exact locations became available and wasn't necessary. Running by watch and compass, the fishers of that time put out their lobster and sea bass traps upon huge meadows of sea whip, sponges and star coral common to our area.
Problem was that lots of other fish and shellfish lived nearby.
There's no disputing the fact that towing a dredge or trawl net over these delicate habitats destroys them - and did.
Today only the most robust rocky bottoms are still pristine; the low-lying substrates have all been damaged at some point - maybe last week. Some areas have regrown only to be mowed back down, a process that seems to take nearly a decade. It's only where there is fear of losing the trawl net or dredge that corals get left alone.
Habitat loss equals holding capacity loss which, in and of itself, must cause a decline in the number of fishes. It's not just that fish were being overcaught ~ the surviving ones had less and less habitat on which to reproduce. Artificial reef can be used to restore some of what has been lost but it would take a tremendous effort to reestablish the original seafloor complexity.
Now there is consensus in the fisheries sciences that seafloor habitat is important - well worth preserving and allowing regrowth to occur. Advances in navigation allow astonishing precision. It is entirely possible for damaging fishing gears to stay clear of corals and rocky areas where corals could again flourish.
Our region's reefs need to get 'discovered' by fisheries scientists and managers before we can see real progress with population restoration. These areas need to be charted and zones of protection for certain gears declared around them. 
Given sound fisheries management, an expanding footprint of habitat will allow populations of reef dwelling fish to recover far more quickly. Predators too would benefit - not just the sharks and marlin, but the recreational and commercial fishers as well.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Archives

February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007   October 2007   November 2007   December 2007   January 2008   February 2008   March 2008   April 2008   May 2008   June 2008   July 2008   August 2008   September 2008   October 2008   November 2008   February 2009   March 2009   May 2009   June 2009   July 2009   August 2009   September 2009   October 2009   November 2009   December 2009   January 2010   February 2010   March 2010   April 2010   May 2010  

RSS FEED