Fish Report 3/27/08
New and Improved
MRIP
Hi All,
Glass rash. If ever you've used a grinder on fiberglass you know.
Last of the itching, hull's finally coming into new glass. A beast when done; putting back more fiberglass that we've taken off.
Had the ol' girl in some very heavy weather over the years; she's always brought us home. Now rejuvenated; not with the intention of staying in worse weather - only in the hope there's another 25 years of fishing in me.
In a world where "New and Improved" often means less product in a bigger box; its my hope that a renewed boat & dropping 3 spots from the rail is seen as a sincere effort at offering 'new and improved' to my clients.
Speaking of N&I (guvmint speak for new and improved) I went to a fisheries meeting the other night. MRIP. I swear they meant MRFSS Rest In Peace, but the speakers insisted that's not so - Marine Recreational Information Program.
Before I go any further: The data acquired by MRFSS interviewers is pristine. I heartily encourage cooperation with them should you get approached by a clipboard wielding field staffer. It's what happens to the data in the upper stories of some office building that causes heartburn. I also hold that this 'intercept' data -what got counted in a cooler- will prove invaluable when there is broad, reliable catch data to work with. They'll be able to back-track with it; figure out what really got caught back in '08 or '98 - maybe even '88.
OK?
Then deeper.
The Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey --MRFSS & why we'll not have fluke for dinner this fall-- is dying. MRIP is taking its place and creates the need for a federal fishing license.
The National Research Council (NRC of course) found numerous flaws in MRFSS several years ago. The report was so devastating that our present fisheries data scheme had to be scrapped and a new way of counting sport caught fish invented - MRIP.
Seems the biggest reason they can't figure our fish is they don't know exactly who to ask about their catch. And, gee, if there was a license requirement they'd know precisely who to ask..
Will.
Curious to see how this plays out. We've all heard enough fish tales to know folk's recollection of how many were caught can fly wildly from the actual figure. Some tempering of the data perhaps.
Will MRIP be New and Improved - or bigger box, less product.. A new set of troubles for sure. Promise.
Though I've always thought licensing would be a good thing in that the moneys raised could be used for restoration, there's a deep distrust of 'Guvmint' around salt water..
Not called a 'license' right now - it's a registry. A national fishing registry.
Some states are way ahead - not Maryland. Maryland has a Bay License with no requirement on the coast. (I buy the MD Chesapeake Party Boat License because it helps pay for management and I'll not have anyone carry my mail.) The Chesapeake ticket isn't fully compliant with federal requirements; modifications are needed. Being able to grade the 'quality' of the data and ensuring contact info are part of the problem. However, getting Maryland's coast anglers 'registered' is primary among the changes needed.
Great Gracious.
Effective January 1, 2010 the Federal Registry will be mandatory -but free- unless a state has a certified license program. Maryland will not have a program in place, they say, until mid-2010.
Going to get gooey. Yup.
The federal registry will not be free in 2011.
Because we submit detailed logs, individuals will not need this federal license on party boats.
Where else you will not need a license is undetermined.
Maybe the fellow that takes his kids to surf fish can get a free pass.
I've always held that there's so little damage to a fish stock occurring from shore that a general exemption would be obvious.
However, having delved into MRFSS numbers with greater scrutiny, I can see I was wrong. For instance, these statistics show that shore fishers are often responsible for over 80% of the flounder catch.
Sneaky rascals; I could've avoided glass-rash by being a shore guide.
Ahhh, maybe not.
Then there's the excitement in the fisheries management community about improving the data. Not just getting closer to the real count of dead fish, but faster, speedier--closer to Tom Clancyesque 'Real Time' data.
Well, Maryland does need to get on with some of this. Apparently our license system requires sellers to have a phone line. Not broadband or any other sort of internet connection, a phone line. Hmm...
With perceptibly increased enthusiasm, the meeting's talk turned to future data acquisition through cell phone downloads.
Really. They meant it.
I can see it now... A chip is installed in your phone when you buy a license.. The dreaded phone call when you're tracked at sea or tidal river bank but fail to make a report - license suspended.
I bet they don't realize some anglers can estimate species & weight of a fish when they hook it, whether it's one big one or two mediums, even exactly where a fish is foul hooked sometimes..
A cell phone/computer interface then: just enter make/model number of the rod, weight of sinker, bait type, drag setting, and hook size. Plug your phone into the rod and the second you bow-up, before the fish is caught, sensors translate the rod's flexure into data. Super real-time data.
Modified rod tips would be a great management tool too, especially when the quota's close to being filled. A 7 pound fluke crosses the rail just as you hook a dandy. Computer calculates yours will be one too many. Slice.
An instantaneous text message -- Sorry Pal, Fluke Season Over.
Easy now! We've gone from 'over the rail, into a pail' -with no fish ever thrown back- to sometimes throwing back 19 out of 20 fish. Trending towards complexity is fine at fisheries management HQ -- keep it simple for participants!
There have been magnificent changes in fisheries caused by simple regulation. The summer flounder stock did in fact grow with a 13 inch size limit. Likewise with the 9 inch/no creel on sea bass.
It's likely that after a few years MRIP data will show jaw-dropping discrepancies in MRFSS data.
The wild gyrations in fish catching that managers so 'clearly' see now will fade as the data improves - insane catch figures of today smoothed - predictable.
Its my hope that the perfecting of catch data will allow managers and, very importantly, sport fish advocates, to seek other means of improving fish populations rather than the single-focus size & creel limit controls of today.
Early man, probably still drawing figures on cave walls, may have figured out that removing trees made squirrels mighty scarce. Squirrel/trees, fish/reef - it'll come together.
Even thinking about starting an ocean advocacy group. Maybe "People Outraged at the Loss of Ocean Habitat".. eh, a couple persons at least.. But what the heck does POLOH have to do with anything?
Ah well, back to boat restoration..
Regards,
Monty
Fish Report 3/10/09
No Fishing Yet - Overhaul Continues
Flounder & Sea Bass Release Mortality
Hi All,
I do believe this was my first Daylight Saving's Time that didn't cause a mess at departure time - no departures from the hard..
Chinese philosophy not my forte; however, I did get a fortune cookie that said "Determination will get you through this." That count?
Fish when done - not too tough to chose between the rod & the sander.
Will send an announcement when ready.
Meanwhile, for the dedicated..
The rise and fall of our region's cbass stock had little to do with counting to 25 or measuring 12 inches. I have written extensively on habitat abundance and fishing pressure - and will, especially with the federal sea bass tag study now released, come to it again. Maximizing spawning potential (it won't be found in large fish) & preventing severe overfishing on regional sub-stocks are key to maintaining abundance.
Here I simply want to point out that recent regulations upping the size limit to 12 1/2 inches will take us further from restoration - not closer.
Reading the American Fisheries Society's August '08 "Journal of Fisheries Management" I saw a passage as stunning as "Semmelweis Orders Doctors to Wash-up After Autopsy - Childbirthing Mortalities Drop."
Discoveries like that leave us wondering "What were they thinking!"
There it was.. In print.. A respected journal even! "For minimum size limits to be effective, a high percentage of sublegal fish either must not be caught or must survive catch and release over the range of capture depths" {Management Brief - Rudershausen et al. 2008 - quoting from Burns and Restrepo 2002}
Marine fisheries restoration is a young science. Really young. Over time most "Marine Fisheries" work has been focused on employment, utilization of species and trade - not restoration.
Just 20 years ago you would not have seen a single fish thrown back on an east coast party boat - Ever!
I was taught as a young man 'No use throwing them back, they'll all die.' That went for every species, all the time.
Worked hard to disprove that: the tagging and recapturing, sitting on the top deck with a stop watch to gather 'float time' before sea bass would swim back down.
Threw back some crazy-big cbass over the years. Learned that they can all survive - If.
If the weather's not too hot & and the water's not too calm. If the hook wasn't too easily swallowed & if the passenger didn't take too long to get the fish overboard. (though if the average float time to re-equalize the airbladder was 45 seconds and a passenger took just under a minute to get a fish back - the fish would swim straight down - no float time)
While tagging fish we found those greater than 17 inches were very difficult to release alive; yet have successfully tagged 'em to over 26 inches in favorable conditions. Hard lessons were learned when upping anchor to chase down newly-tagged drifters more suited to frying than data-ing. The older the fish, even by a few months, the more it has grown. That growth includes the air bladder. Barotrauma (air bladder expansion) as evidenced by stomach protrusion isn't always fatal - tagging proved that - but it dern sure lowers the odds, making fine details of weather and water temp key players.
Survival was incredibly high with the tiny 9 inch fish that we once measured so carefully. Over the years I saw that the survival percentage curve begins to fall quickly at about 11 1/2 inches.
During those first lonely years of a 9 inch limit the stock climbed locally. We could see hook wounds on fish we were throwing back. Sometimes 4 scars could be found on a slow-learner's lip.
Sea bass population already climbing; federal regulation brought full blossom.* The stock flourished to crescendo in 2003, coincidently the first year of the 12 inch size limit, and has since declined. For '09 the size limit is now 12 1/2 inches and remains at 25 fish.
As those long ago doctors, unwashed between autopsy & delivery, drove up the maternal mortality rate -- so too will managers, through regulation, cause a real increase in sea bass release mortality in areas over 110 feet deep.
The gulls will benefit though........
(* see second paragraph)
Bycatch, whether recreational or commercial, can be inadvertent --the gill netter didn't mean to capture that sturgeon. Or it can be regulatory --he did intend to catch trout, but many were too small - gull food.
Recreational regulatory release mortality, our bycatch, will be the highest in history this coming season.
Sea bass will certainly factor into this sad state. However, most of the waste will be in the summer flounder fishery.
Fluke don't posses an air bladder - they do not suffer barotrauma. Its their big mouth that gets 'em in trouble. Deeply hooked fish suffering injuries to vitals such as the heart die.
I know they didn't have latex gloves, but did those doctors really not wash their hands - not even between dead patients and live ones?
Managers know they've been dealt a bad hand, they know the data upon which they base their management is vitally flawed. If a city or county pulled numbers from thin air to base their tax rates on one might soon expect, beside individual challenges, a different result in following elections.
In what form then can fishers express their displeasure? We surely have a means to have our voices heard in matters of management, yet behind a federal veil lie 'harvest data' - the Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey. We can argue division of quota, but not how catch data is accounted.
Most recreational fishers are more than willing to shoulder their share of fisheries restoration. I've had thousands of clients release fish they could have kept - often because they perceive that government regulation hadn't gone far enough. In the summer flounder fishery that pendulum has swung far to the other side - fisheries restoration run amok.
The benefits owed to fishers for past restoration efforts will be denied because of data as soft as a crab-eaten flounder.
Next year our 'overfishing' will be more severe than last because larger size limits will mean many more releases - a percentage of those releases will be counted against our quota - the release mortality figure.
If allowed to continue, down the road we'll have a 5 week catch and release only season; our quota filled by release mortality.
It needs to be fixed.
Regards,
Monty